147-11Soil Ecosystem Recovery Should Be Quantifiable.
See more from this Division: S07 Forest, Range & Wildland SoilsSee more from this Session: Soil Responses to and Ecosystem Services Provided by Forest, Range and Wildland Soil Management: I
Monday, October 22, 2012
Duke Energy Convention Center, Exhibit Hall AB, Level 1
Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) costs close to two billion dollars in federal funds every year; and yet, it is challenging to evaluate its effectiveness to assist the decision making process. Using a combination of physical properties and microbial indicators, we found that it is possible to make a general assessment of the soil ecosystem recovery based on evaluations of fields under CRP in comparison to adjacent wheat fields and fields containing native perennial vegetation that had been kept undisturbed for at least 20 years. Studies were conducted to compare these three ecosystems at two different sites and soil samples were taken twice a year for two consecutive years. Measurements included basic soil properties, aggregate stability, and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis. Using an aggregated value of multiple soil quality indicators, we found that the soil under CRP at one location had recovered approximately 10%, while the other had recovered approximately 50% when compared to the adjacent undisturbed soil ecosystem under native vegetation.
See more from this Division: S07 Forest, Range & Wildland SoilsSee more from this Session: Soil Responses to and Ecosystem Services Provided by Forest, Range and Wildland Soil Management: I
<< Previous Abstract
|
Next Abstract