281-32 Ammonia Volatilization and Rice Growth As Affected By Rainfall Amount and Urease Inhibitor.

Poster Number 2135

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
See more from this Session: Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Division and Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis Division Graduate Student Poster Competition (MS degree)

Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Tampa Convention Center, East Exhibit Hall

Randy J. Dempsey, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Poster Presentation
  • 2013 Tampa ASA Poster R. Dempsey.pdf (1.2 MB)
  • Abstract:
    Ammonia Volatilization and Rice Growth as Affected by Rainfall Amount and Urease Inhibitor

     

    R.J. Dempsey*, N.A. Slaton, C.G. Massey, and R.E. DeLong

    Dept. of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.

    Urea is the most common N source used in the direct-seeded, delayed-flood method of rice (Oryza sativa L.) production in Arkansas and has a high potential for ammonia (NH3) volatilization if not quickly incorporated into the soil by timely rainfall or flooding.  Our objective was to compare the effects of simulated rainfall amounts and N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide rate on NH3 volatilization and rice N uptake and grain yield.  Two experiments were conducted in 2013 on an alkaline Calhoun silt loam in Arkansas.  Ammonia volatilization loss was measured in only one trial.  Urea or NBPT-treated urea (urea-NBPT, 0.88 g NBPT kg-1 urea) was applied at 112 kg N ha-1 and compared to a no N control.  Each N source was subjected to six simulated rainfall amounts of 0, 3.18, 6.35, 12.70, 19.05, or 25.40 mm.  The permanent flood was established 12 d after N application and rainfall simulation in the trial where NH3 volatilization was measured and 6 d after in the second trial.  Ammonia volatilization, N uptake, and grain yield were regressed on simulated rainfall amount, allowing for both linear and quadratic terms with coefficients depending on N source.  Cumulative NH3 volatilization was influenced by a significant N source by rainfall interaction (P<0.0001).  Cumulative NH3 loss from urea-NBPT ranged from 0.3 to 2.4% of the applied N and was similar across simulated rainfall amounts.  In contrast, cumulative NH3 loss from urea ranged from 0.3 to 12.5% of the applied N and was greatest with no simulated rainfall and decreased quadratically as rainfall amount increased.  Cumulative NH3 loss from urea-NBPT was significantly lower than urea when simulated rainfall was <19.05 mm, but similar when simulated rainfall amounts were ≥19.05 mm.  Nitrogen uptake and grain yield data will also be presented.

    See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Soil Fertility & Plant Nutrition
    See more from this Session: Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition Division and Nutrient Management and Soil and Plant Analysis Division Graduate Student Poster Competition (MS degree)