372-1 Comparison of Southern P Indices to Water Quality Data.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Progress on the Regional P Index Conservation Innovation Grants
Wednesday, November 5, 2014: 10:05 AM
Long Beach Convention Center, Room 203B
Share |

Deanna L. Osmond, PO Box 7619, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, Carl H. Bolster, USDA-ARS, Bowling Green, KY, Miguel Cabrera, Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, Sam E. Feagley, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, Charles C. Mitchell, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, Rao S. Mylavarapu, Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Larry Larry Oldham, 32 Creelman Street, 117 Dorman Hall, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, Andrew N. Sharpley, Department of Crop, Soil & Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, Forbes R. Walker, 2506 E J Chapman Drive, University of Tennessee - Knoxville, Knoxville, TN and Hailin Zhang, Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
USDA-NRCS revised their 590 Nutrient Management Conservation Standard in 2012 with the intent of normalizing P-Index values across state lines.  The Southern Region (AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, and TX) has a collaborative project, Refine and Regionalize Southern Phosphorous Assessment Tools Based on Validation and State Priorities, to explore current model (APEX, APLE, and TBET) functionality as a potential P Index.  In addition, it is expected that P losses from agricultural fields derived from experimental datasets (AR, GA, MS, NC, OK, and TX) be compared to each southern state’s P Index. There is a lack of consistency of state P Indices when used on the same data set, as States tended to develop their Indices independently of their neighbors.  Also, P leaching, a major pathway of P transport in sandy soils in Florida and Coastal Plains area of the southeast, have not been included.  Further, there has been a general reluctance by various stakeholders to relate Index risk, amounts of P runoff, and receiving water quality impairment. These data will be presented to demonstrate the problems with assigning risk.
See more from this Division: ASA Section: Environmental Quality
See more from this Session: Progress on the Regional P Index Conservation Innovation Grants
Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>