130-3 Soil 15N Enrichment in a Whole Watershed 15N Tracer Experiment in New England Forests.

See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Forest, Range & Wildland Soils
See more from this Session: Forest, Range & Wildland Soils: I
Monday, November 3, 2014: 2:05 PM
Long Beach Convention Center, Seaside Ballroom B
Share |

Marie-Cecile Gruselle1, Ivan J. Fernandez2, Kevin S Simon3 and Stephen A Norton1, (1)University of Maine, Orono, ME
(2)School of Forest Resources, University of Maine, Orono, ME
(3)The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Changes in nutrient stoichiometry and nitrogen (N) cycling are important consequences of chronic N inputs in temperate forest ecosystems. The Bear Brook Watershed in Maine (BBWM) is a long-term experimental paired watershed experiment studying the effects of acidification and N enrichment on forest biogeochemistry. The West Bear (WB) watershed has been subjected to long-term ammonium sulfate additions (25.2 kg N ha-1 y-1 and 28.8 kg S ha-1 y-1) and the East Bear (EB) watershed serves as the reference watershed. Each watershed includes 10 permanent sampling plots. Within these plots were sub-plots amended with phosphorus (P) fertilizer (NaH2PO4.H2O, 100 kg P ha-1) and control sub-plots (no Phosphorus) installed on June 1, 2012. On June 5, 2012, both watersheds were enriched with 0.4 kg ha-1 of 98-atom % (15NH4)2SO4 using backpack sprayers. Immediately following the treatment began a schedule of repeated sampling to follow the redistribution of the 15N tracer through the ecosystem. Here we report forest floor and mineral soil 15N enrichments (using the δ notation, ‰) in the “phosphorus added” and the control sub-plots over the 2012 and 2013 growing seasons. Forest floor (Oe and Oa layers) mean 15N enrichments in the control sub-plots were significantly higher than prior to the tracer addition in both watersheds and ranged between 3.3 and 7.3 ‰ in the reference watershed (EB) and between 5.8 and 14.4 ‰ in the N treated watershed (WB). In the “phosphorus added” sub-plots, the mean 15N enrichments varied from 3.2 to 12.7 ‰ in EB and from 5.2 to 18.3 ‰ in WB across the two growing seasons. The forest floor 15N enrichments were significantly higher in WB sub-plots than in EB but did not differ between sub-plot types, indicating no P treatment effect. This finding shows a long-term N manipulation effect for both sub-plot types. Enrichments were also time dependent – forest floor 15N enrichments in WB control and “phosphorus added” sub-plots were higher in the second growing season than the first one after the tracer application, whereas this was not observed in EB, the reference watershed. Moreover, the mineral soil 15N enrichments were significantly higher than prior to the tracer addition in both watersheds and sub-plot types. In the control sub-plots, mean 15N enrichments ranged between 6.9 and 8.9‰ in EB and between 7.7 and 9.7‰ in WB. In the “phosphorus added” sub-plots, the mean 15N enrichments varied from 6.7 to 9.3‰ in EB and from 6.6 to 9.4‰ in WB. No differences in enrichments between watersheds or sub-plot types were found for the mineral soil. However, the mineral soil 15N enrichments generally increased within two weeks of tracer application and then decreased in the 2012 and 2013 growing seasons in both sub-plot types and watersheds. The preliminary conclusions from these results are that (i) a significant isotopic enrichment was achieved in both watersheds and sub-plot types that was a function of time, (ii) the P addition treatment did not lead to higher 15N enrichment either in the forest floor or the mineral B horizon over two growing seasons, and (iii) the watershed subjected to long-term N additions was cycling N faster as evidenced by higher 15N enrichments in the forest floor compared to the reference watershed in both sub-plot types.
See more from this Division: SSSA Division: Forest, Range & Wildland Soils
See more from this Session: Forest, Range & Wildland Soils: I