An Economic Analysis of Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in Iowa, USA.

Diversified cropping systems integrated with livestock production can provide substantial soil conservation and water quality benefits, yet farmers in the U.S. Corn Belt have shifted toward greater specialization of farming systems in recent decades. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the economic feasibility of re-integrating crops and livestock in farming systems of the U.S. Corn Belt. Using data on farming practices and yields from a long-term cropping systems trial, we calculated annual revenue and costs of four farming systems–a simple corn-soybean rotation with and without cattle (2-yr cash and 2-yr integrated, respectively) and a diversified corn-soybean-oat/alfalfa-alfalfa rotation with and without cattle (4-yr cash and 4-yr integrated, respectively). Our analysis was conducted for a 405-hectare parcel in central Iowa over the period of 2008 to 2015. Cattle enterprises differed for the 2- and 4-yr rotations to maximize the use of harvested crops: yearlings were finished using a diet of mostly concentrate feeds for the 2-yr integrated system and calves were backgrounded and finished using a diet of forages and concentrates for the 4-yr integrated system. We found that average annual returns to land and management were similar among all four farming systems. The integrated systems exhibited greater variability in returns to land and management among years than the cash systems. In addition, total costs excluding land and management were four- to nine-fold greater for the integrated crop-livestock systems than for the cash crop systems. Labor requirements increased with crop rotation diversification and with integration of cattle. We concluded that diversified crop rotations with or without cattle are economically feasible farming systems in Iowa, but require greater capital and labor inputs than the dominant 2-yr cash grain system.