Managing Global Resources for a Secure Future

2017 Annual Meeting | Oct. 22-25 | Tampa, FL

210-4 Evaluation of Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation Practices for Mid-South Rice Production.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Agronomic Production Systems
See more from this Session: Symposium--Current Issues in Soil and Water Management

Tuesday, October 24, 2017: 10:20 AM
Tampa Convention Center, Room 8

Richard Lee Atwill II1, Larry Jason Krutz1, Bobby R. Golden2 and Jason Bond3, (1)Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS
(2)Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS
(3)Delta Research and Experiment Station, Stoneville, MS
Abstract:
Rice irrigation currently accounts for the greatest amount of irrigation water applied per acre over corn, soybeans, and cotton in the mid-south. The alluvial aquifer serves as the major source of irrigation water for rice production in Mississippi; however, it is declining at a rate of 300,000 acre feet per year and has done so for approximately 25 years. An experiment was conducted at the Delta Research and Extension Center in Stoneville, MS to evaluate the yield and physiological response of rice to several alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation regimes. Three rice cultivars were evaluated in six different rice irrigation treatments. Irrigation treatments included: a continuous flood, allowing the flood to recede to the soil surface, 4” below the soil surface, 8” below the soil surface, 12” below the soil surface, and 16” below the soil surface. Water level in each paddy was monitored and irrigation events were triggered at each respective threshold back to a 4” flood, then allowed to subside until threshold was reached. Rice grain yield response of two AWD treatments were equal to rice grown with a continuous flood. A ten bushel grain yield increase was observed when the flood within a paddy was allowed to recede to the soil surface compared to a continuous flood. Grain yield for continuous flood was equal to rice grown with flood receding to 4” below soil surface. Reduction of grain yield was observed when the flood receded past 8” below the soil surface as compared to a continuous flood. Data from this experiment from 2015-2016 suggest that allowing flood to subside to 4 inches below the soil surface does not result in yield loss compared to a continuous flooded system. Water management practices that reduce groundwater withdrawals are a viable option for rice producers in the mid-south.

See more from this Division: ASA Section: Agronomic Production Systems
See more from this Session: Symposium--Current Issues in Soil and Water Management